Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Fiat Stilo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 137 HP | 80 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 114 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 16.7 seconds | 8.9 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.7 | 5.4 - 9.8 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Fiat Stilo. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 6 cm shorter than the Fiat Stilo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.4 metres less than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`088 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |