Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Opel Combo 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 65 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 130 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 25 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.4 | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
1300 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.80 m | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 16 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 455 litres | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Xsara Picasso has 95 litres more trunk space than the Opel Combo. The Opel Combo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`990 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Opel Combo has
| |