Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 19 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | Used also on Ford Focus | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 5 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |