Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 135 NM | 147 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 20 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Citroen Xsara. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.9 | |
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.40 m | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 9 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 24 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.0/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |