Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Opel Meriva 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 137 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 191 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 12 HP more power than Opel Meriva, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Opel Meriva. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.8 | |
The Opel Meriva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Opel Meriva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 407, Peugeot 206 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Signum | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 24 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1410 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 metres more than that of the Opel Meriva, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`835 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | average | |
Opel Meriva has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Opel Meriva, so Opel Meriva quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |