Citroen Xantia 1995 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 131 HP | |
Torque: | 176 NM | 176 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xantia engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xantia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.4 | |
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xantia consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xantia could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xantia is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xantia is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1610 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xantia is 1.1 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Citroen Xantia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`955 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | low | |
Citroen Xantia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Citroen Xantia, so Citroen Xantia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xantia has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |