Citroen C6 2007 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Citroen C6 engine produces 45 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 120 NM more than SAAB 9-3. Despite the higher power, Citroen C6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.6 | |
|
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C6 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C6 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Citroen C6 is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen C6 is 27 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 10 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C6 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C6 is 1.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Citroen C6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C6 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |