Citroen C6 2005 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 - 241 HP | 120 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 - 450 NM | 167 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 11.2 seconds | 7.5 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 11.2 | 5.8 - 9.5 | |
|
Citroen C6 petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3. On average, Citroen C6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Citroen C6 is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen C6 is 27 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 10 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C6 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C6 is 1.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Citroen C6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`309 | ~ 1`577 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |