Citroen C4 2004 vs Skoda Fabia 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 153 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 engine produces 5 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 6 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Despite the higher power, Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C4 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
760 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 3.99 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
Citroen C4 is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen C4 is 28 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 13 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1023 litres | 1163 litres | |
Citroen C4 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 140 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C4 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Citroen C4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`732 | 1`585 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |