Citroen C4 2005 vs Skoda Fabia 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 69 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 155 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
Citroen C4 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C4 engine produces 41 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Citroen C4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Citroen C4 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen C4 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 3.99 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
Citroen C4 is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen C4 is 28 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 13 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1023 litres | 1163 litres | |
Citroen C4 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 140 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C4 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Citroen C4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |