Citroen C4 2012 vs Volvo S40 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 150 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 240 NM | 143 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.8 seconds | 7.3 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 7.9 | 5.6 - 9.7 | |
|
Citroen C4 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Citroen C4 is larger. Citroen C4 is 14 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 7 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 853 litres | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 has 31 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. This could mean that the Citroen C4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`847 | ~ 1`756 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |