Citroen C4 2012 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 150 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 240 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.8 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 7.9 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
|
Citroen C4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Citroen C4 is larger, but lower. Citroen C4 is 34 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C4 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Citroen C4 has 110 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This could mean that the Citroen C4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`847 | ~ 1`267 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |