Citroen C4 Picasso 2007 vs Ford S-Max 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Picasso engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford S-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Picasso consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.47 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen C4 Picasso is 30 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 854 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Picasso is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford S-Max, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Picasso has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |