Citroen C4 Cactus 2014 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 254 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Citroen C4 Cactus engine produces 12 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Despite less power, Citroen C4 Cactus reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.1 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.6 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Cactus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1610 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1660 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus is smaller. Citroen C4 Cactus is 28 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Cactus is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 358 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Citroen C4 Cactus has 179 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Cactus is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in safety tests. The Citroen C4 Picasso scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Cactus has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Cactus has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |