Citroen C4 Cactus 2014 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Cactus engine produces 108 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 122 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Cactus reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Cactus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C4 Cactus engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Cactus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.57 m | |
| Citroen C4 Cactus is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Cactus is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 358 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has more luggage capacity. Citroen C4 Cactus has 107 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Cactus is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Juke scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Citroen C4 Cactus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Cactus, so Citroen C4 Cactus quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Cactus has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |