Citroen C4 Cactus 2014 vs Volvo V40 2012
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C4 Cactus engine produces 68 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 122 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Citroen C4 Cactus reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Citroen C4 Cactus over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C4 Cactus consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 133 mm (5.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus is smaller, but higher. Citroen C4 Cactus is 21 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C4 Cactus is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 358 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C4 Cactus has 23 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C4 Cactus is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests, butCitroen C4 Cactus is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V40 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Cactus has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C4 Cactus has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |