Citroen C3 Picasso 2009 vs Citroen Nemo 2009

 
Citroen C3 Picasso
2009 - 2013
Citroen Nemo
2009 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.4 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 110 HP68 HP
Torque: 245 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds18 seconds
Citroen C3 Picasso is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen C3 Picasso engine produces 42 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Citroen Nemo. Thanks to more power Citroen C3 Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen C3 Picasso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen C3 Picasso could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1040 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1180 km on highway
920 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Engines

Engine production duration: 8 years2 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 PicassoUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C3 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.08 m3.96 m
Width: 1.77 m2.02 m
Height: 1.67 m1.72 m
Citroen C3 Picasso is 12 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 25 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres360 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1506 litresno data
Citroen C3 Picasso has more luggage capacity.
Citroen C3 Picasso has 25 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Nemo.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8071`700
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 38002800
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 Picasso has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Citroen Nemo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv