Citroen C3 Picasso 2008 vs Volkswagen Golf Plus 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Citroen C3 Picasso
2008 - 2013
Volkswagen Golf Plus
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG)1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 90 - 120 HP75 - 170 HP
Torque: 133 - 245 NM126 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 - 15.7 seconds8.2 - 16.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 6.45.4 - 8.6
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf Plus. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Plus.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.08 m4.21 m
Width: 1.77 m1.76 m
Height: 1.67 m1.58 m
Citroen C3 Picasso is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf Plus, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres395 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1506 litresno data
Citroen C3 Picasso has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Plus.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf Plus.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`773~ 1`281
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

high
Average price (€): 38003000
Pros and Cons: Citroen C3 Picasso has
  • petrol, diesel and LPG engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
Volkswagen Golf Plus has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv