Citroen C3 Picasso 2008 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 120 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 - 245 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 15.7 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.4 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
|
Citroen C3 Picasso petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Citroen C3 Picasso equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.08 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
| Citroen C3 Picasso is 20 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C3 Picasso is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1506 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Citroen C3 Picasso has 165 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C3 Picasso is 0.9 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Citroen C3 Picasso can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`773 | ~ 1`267 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C3 Picasso has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |