Citroen C2 2003 vs Citroen C3 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 61 - 125 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 94 - 150 NM | 94 - 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 14.4 seconds | 10.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 6.9 | 4.4 - 7.2 | |
Citroen C2 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C3. On average, Citroen C2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.67 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
Citroen C2 is smaller. Citroen C2 is 18 cm shorter than the Citroen C3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C2 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 305 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
879 litres | 1150 litres | |
Citroen C3 has more luggage space. Citroen C2 has 112 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 271 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen C2 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C3, which means Citroen C2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`390 | ~ 1`547 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C2 has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |