Citroen C1 2014 vs Smart ForFour 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Smart ForFour is a more dynamic driving. Citroen C1 engine produces 21 HP less power than Smart ForFour, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Smart ForFour. Due to the lower power, Citroen C1 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen C1 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour, which means that by driving the Citroen C1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen C1 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 28 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 430 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C1) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Smart ForFour) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.44 m | 3.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Citroen C1 is smaller. Citroen C1 is 5 cm shorter than the Smart ForFour, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C1 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 196 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
780 litres | 975 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Citroen C1 has 12 litres more trunk space than the Smart ForFour. The Smart ForFour may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 195 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 8.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C1 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Smart ForFour, which means Citroen C1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`240 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Smart ForFour has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C1 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Smart ForFour, so Smart ForFour quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C1 has
|
Smart ForFour has
| |