Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 16 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C-Crosser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen C-Crosser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Citroen C-Crosser is 13 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 955 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 115 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 731 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |