Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs BMW X3 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 6 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 50 NM more than BMW X3. Thanks to more power Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
740 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C-Crosser engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.65 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
Citroen C-Crosser is 8 cm longer than the BMW X3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1560 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Citroen C-Crosser has 39 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. This could mean that the Citroen C-Crosser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 126 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`265 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 6200 | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
BMW X3 has
| |