Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Toyota RAV4 2006

 
Citroen C-Crosser
2007 - 2012
Toyota RAV4
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 170 HP170 HP
Torque: 232 NM224 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds10.6 seconds
Citroen C-Crosser and Toyota RAV4 have the same engine power, but Citroen C-Crosser torque is 8 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.310.3
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen C-Crosser consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway750 km on highway
Citroen C-Crosser gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)
Ground clearance: 174 mm (6.9 inches)180 mm (7.1 inches)

Engines

Engine production duration: 18 years19 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.40 m
Width: 1.81 m1.82 m
Height: 1.67 m1.72 m
Citroen C-Crosser is 25 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 5 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 184 litres586 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 184 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 441 litres586 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1686 litres1470 litres
In 5-seat version Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space (by 145 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C-Crosser (by 216 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 1.8 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`4102`110
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 62005200
Pros and Cons: Citroen C-Crosser has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Toyota RAV4 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv