Citroen C-Crosser 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is more dynamic to drive. Citroen C-Crosser engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Citroen C-Crosser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.1 | |
|
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen C-Crosser consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Citroen C-Crosser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C-Crosser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Citroen C-Crosser is larger. Citroen C-Crosser is 11 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen C-Crosser is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 184 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 441 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1691 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Citroen C-Crosser has more luggage space (by 39 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen C-Crosser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Citroen C-Crosser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen C-Crosser has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |