Citroen Berlingo 2006 vs Citroen Xsara 2003

 
Citroen Berlingo
2006 - 2008
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP110 HP
Torque: 120 NM147 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.7 seconds9.9 seconds
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Berlingo engine produces 35 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Citroen Xsara. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.26.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Berlingo could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
660 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.37 m
Width: 1.72 m1.70 m
Height: 1.81 m1.42 m
Citroen Berlingo is 23 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 39 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 624 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2800 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8001`100
Safety: no data
Quality:Citroen Berlingo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Berlingo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 1200800
Pros and Cons:
    Citroen Xsara has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv