Citroen Berlingo 2002 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Citroen Berlingo
2002 - 2005
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Body: Estate car / wagonMinivan / MPV
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP150 HP
Torque: 120 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.7 seconds10.9 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Berlingo engine produces 75 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Citroen Berlingo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.29.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Berlingo consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Citroen Berlingo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Berlingo consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway950 km on highway
700 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Sharan engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Volkswagen Sharan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.63 m
Width: 1.72 m1.81 m
Height: 1.81 m1.73 m
Citroen Berlingo is smaller, but higher.
Citroen Berlingo is 49 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Berlingo is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 624 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2800 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Berlingo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Citroen Berlingo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7801`900
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Citroen Berlingo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Berlingo, so Citroen Berlingo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 14002600
Pros and Cons: Citroen Berlingo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv