Chrysler Town & Country 2001 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler Town & Country engine produces 6 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 12.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Town & Country is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Town & Country consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Town & Country over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Town & Country gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Town & Country and Chrysler Grand Voyager are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 153 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 153 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4754 litres | 4130 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Town & Country (by 624 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Town & Country has
|
| |