Chrysler Stratus 1996 vs Toyota Celica 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Stratus engine produces 14 HP less power than Toyota Celica, but torque is 32 NM more than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Stratus reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 9.9 | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Stratus consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Stratus could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.33 m | |
|
Chrysler Stratus is larger. Chrysler Stratus is 40 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Stratus is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Stratus is 1.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Chrysler Stratus can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Celica has
| |