Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs BMW 3 series 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 45 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 244 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 540 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.93 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 35 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 350 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 17 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.13 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.13 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`175 | 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |