Chrysler Sebring 1994 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 34 HP less power than Nissan 200 SX, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Nissan 200 SX. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 9.3 | |
|
The Nissan 200 SX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan 200 SX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan 200 SX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan 200 SX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Sebring is 24 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 307 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 63 litres more trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |