Chrysler Sebring 1994 vs Honda Civic 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 61 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 7.0 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 675 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 30 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 35 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Honda Civic has
| |