Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Ford Cougar 1998

 
Chrysler Sebring
2000 - 2007
Ford Cougar
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 203 HP170 HP
Torque: 278 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds8.6 seconds
Chrysler Sebring engine produces 33 HP more power than Ford Cougar, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Ford Cougar. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.19.5
Real fuel consumption: 10.0 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Cougar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 90 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Cougar.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway820 km on highway
620 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.83 m4.70 m
Width: 1.79 m1.77 m
Height: 1.37 m1.32 m
Chrysler Sebring is larger.
Chrysler Sebring is 13 cm longer than the Ford Cougar, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data930 litres
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity.
Chrysler Sebring has 30 litres more trunk space than the Ford Cougar.
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`825
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 20001600
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Sebring has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Ford Cougar has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv