Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 21 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.1 | |
| Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Sebring is 26 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 420 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |