Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Volvo S80 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 3 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 18 NM less than Volvo S80. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.0 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo 960, Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |