Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Audi A6 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 23 HP more power than Audi A6, but torque is 108 NM less than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Audi A6 2001: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control, which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) and applies braking to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differentials. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Sebring engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A8 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 4 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 551 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 96 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Audi A6 has
| |