Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Toyota Camry 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Camry is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Toyota Camry. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Camry is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Sebring consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Camry gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler PT Cruiser, Mitsubishi Eclipse | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Previa | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Camry might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Sebring engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.50 m | |
| Chrysler Sebring is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Camry, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |