Chrysler Sebring 2003 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 203 HP | 131 HP | |
Torque: | 262 NM | 181 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Chrysler Sebring is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Sebring engine produces 72 HP more power than Chevrolet Evanda, whereas torque is 81 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. Thanks to more power Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.6 | |
The Chevrolet Evanda is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
730 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Chevrolet Evanda gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
Chrysler Sebring is 7 cm longer than the Chevrolet Evanda, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.8 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |