Chrysler Sebring 2009 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 30 HP more power than Chevrolet Epica, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Chevrolet Epica. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Sebring reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.3 | |
|
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 39 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.13 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.33 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |