Chrysler Sebring 2007 vs Volvo C70 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 172 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 32 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Volvo C70. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.6 | |
| Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 27 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 193 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 404 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 7 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 1.6 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Chrysler Sebring can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
| |