Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 172 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 22 HP more power than SAAB 9-3, but torque is 18 NM less than SAAB 9-3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.3 | |
|
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Sebring could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 21 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |