Chrysler Sebring 2006 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 172 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Sebring engine produces 16 HP more power than Chevrolet Epica, but torque is 15 NM less than Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 9.3 | |
| Chrysler Sebring consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that by driving the Chrysler Sebring over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 39 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |