Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Sebring is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes CLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 2.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 136 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 190 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 12.3 seconds | 6.2 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 10.6 | 9.4 - 12.2 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 35 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`990 | ~ 2`031 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
| |