Chrysler Sebring 1994 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Sebring is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 166 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 - 230 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 11 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 11.5 | 8.8 - 9.3 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger. Chrysler Sebring is 26 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 307 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 63 litres more trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |