Chrysler Sebring 1994 vs Mercedes CLK 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Sebring is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes CLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 166 HP | 136 - 279 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 - 230 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 11 seconds | 6.3 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 11.5 | 9.4 - 11.2 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but lower. Chrysler Sebring is 21 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 420 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler Sebring has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. This could mean that the Chrysler Sebring uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`853 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |