Chrysler Sebring 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler Sebring is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes CLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 - 203 HP | 136 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 214 - 278 NM | 190 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 5.4 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 10.1 | 9.3 - 11.7 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Sebring is 26 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 420 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Sebring has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`869 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
| |