Chrysler Sebring 2001 vs Kia Clarus 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.7 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 203 HP | 116 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 262 NM | 152 - 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11 seconds | 10.7 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 10.6 | 9.3 - 11.1 | |
|
Chrysler Sebring petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Clarus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Sebring is 11 cm longer than the Kia Clarus, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Sebring is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 444 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 784 litres | |
| Chrysler Sebring has 11 litres more trunk space than the Kia Clarus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Sebring is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Clarus, which means Chrysler Sebring can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`943 | ~ 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Sebring has
|
Kia Clarus has
| |