Chrysler Pacifica 2006 vs Nissan Navara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 257 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 83 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 48 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 8.5 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Pacifica consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Town & Country, Dodge Caravan, Volkswagen Routan | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Pacifica engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Chrysler Pacifica is 17 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 16 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 1.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |