Chrysler Pacifica 2006 vs Ford Ranger 2006

 
Chrysler Pacifica
2006 - 2008
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 4.0 Petrol2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 257 HP143 HP
Torque: 355 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds12 seconds
Chrysler Pacifica engine produces 114 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford Ranger.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.38.9
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chrysler Pacifica consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Pacifica could require 510 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 87 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway800 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 149 mm (5.9 inches)205 mm (8.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 5.05 m5.08 m
Width: 2.01 m1.81 m
Height: 1.74 m1.76 m
Chrysler Pacifica is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 21 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 2 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 370 litres1500 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 370 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data1500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2250 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12.1 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Chrysler Pacifica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data3`020
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 26007600
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Pacifica has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Ford Ranger has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv