Chrysler Pacifica 2006 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler Pacifica is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chrysler 300C can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler Pacifica also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 - 4.0 (petrol) | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 213 - 257 HP | 193 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 - 355 NM | 257 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 5 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 13.8 | 8.3 - 14.0 | |
|
On average, the Chrysler Pacifica petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is larger. Chrysler Pacifica is 4 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Pacifica is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 630 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2250 litres | 1602 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Pacifica has 260 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. This could mean that the Chrysler Pacifica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 648 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Pacifica is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`334 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Pacifica has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |